AIRPORT SECURITY DETECTION C HECK WHAT ARE THE REAL LIMITS?
Keywords:
behavior detection, security checks, aviation security, working environmentAbstract
This article deals with one part of the ongoing project of the Air transport department of the University College of Business in Prague. This project aims to apply modern trends and knowledge in the process of detection checks at airports and thus to modify the screening sites on the basis of this knowledge. Partial goals of the project are behavioural detection and working environment. The text of the article itself deals with the boundary conditions of the project - about limits. These limits mainly concern the absence of the necessary legislative base in the EU. The aim of this article is to highlight important and rigorous marginal conditions in this area that do not allow innovative approaches to most scientific and other projects. That is why the project team of aimed at one of the outputs of the project also proposal for the direction of research activities in this sphere of civil aviation protection against unlawful acts. This article deals with this recommendation.
Downloads
References
(2) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, amending Directive 95/16/EC, OJ L157.
(3) COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1998 of 5 November 2015 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security, OJ L299.
(4) EUROPEAN AGENCY FOR SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, ©2009. The human-machine interfaces as an emerging risk. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work [online]. [cit. 2016-08-20]. ISBN 978-92-9191-300-8. Dostupné z: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/ literature_reviews/HMI_emerging_risk
(5) EUROPEAN AGENCY FOR SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, ©2013. Priorities for occupational safety and health research in Europe: 2013-2020. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. ISSN 1831-9351.
(6) Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2016. Shoe Bomber [online]. From: http://www.fbi.gov/shohe_bomb (accessed 2017-10-14)
(7) HÄTTENSCHWILER, N. et al., 2015a. A First Exploratory Study on the Relevance of Everyday Object Knowledge and Training for Increasing Efficiency in Airport Security X-ray Screening. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology. National Central University, Taiwan, s. 25-30. ISBN 0-7803-3537-6.
(8) HÄTTENSCHWILER, N. et al., 2015b. A Relevanz situativer Einflussfaktoren auf die Arbeit von Luftsicherheitskontrollpersonal bei der Röntgenbildbeurteilung - eine Arbeitsanalyse. 61. Frühjahrskongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (GfA). Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, s. 1-5. ISBN 978-3-936804-18-8.
(9) HÁČIK, L., 2006. Lidská výkonnost a omezení (Human Performance and Limitations) (040 00). Brno: Akademické nakladatelství CERM.ISBN 978-80-7204-471-9.
(10) CHUNDELA, L. Ergonomie. Praha: Vydavatelství ČVUT, 2013. 173 s. ISBN 978-80-01-05173-3.
(11) INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANISATION, 2006. Annex 17 to the Convention. Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference.
(12) KERNER, L., SÝKORA, V., KULČÁK, L., 2003. Provozní aspekty letišť. Praha: Vydavatelství ČVUT. ISBN 80-01-02841-0.
(13) KOVERDYNSKÝ, B., 2014. Letecka security. Cheb: Svět křídel. ISBN 978-80-87567-51-7.
(14) PALATKOVÁ, M., 2014. Mezinárodní turismus. Praha: Grada. ISBN 978-80-247-3750-8.
(15) REASON, J., 1997. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Brookfield, Vt., USA: Ashgate, 1997. ISBN 184-01-4105-0.
(16) RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2010/C 184 E/25) of 24 April 2009 Profiling, notably on the basis of ethnicity and race, in counter-terrorism, law, enforcement, immigration, customs and border control. OJ L255
(17) SCHWANINGER A. et al., 2016. About us. CASRA [online]. [accessed. 2017-10-28]. From: https://www.casra.ch/en/aboutus/team.html?tx_tvteam_pi1%5Bperson% 5D=2&tx_tvteam_pi1%5Baction%5D=show&tx_tvteam_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=Person&cHash=d08349c77ef653b21b84c4e4fa55157
(18) STOLK, CH. et al., 2012. Management of psychosocial risks at work: an analysis of the findings of the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-929-19-1735-8.
(19) ŠČUREK, R., MARŠÁLEK, D., 2014. Technologie fyzické ochrany civilního letiště. Brno: Akademické nakladatelství CERM. ISBN 978-80-7204-862-5.
(20) TSA, ©2012. TSA Checkpoint Design Guide: Revision 4.0. [online]. TSA [accessed 2016-08-05]. From: http://www.aci-na.org/sites/default/files/ Checkpoint_Design_Guide _(CDG) _Rev_4_0.pdf