INTELLIGENT VEHICLE SYSTEMS – COLLISION MITIGATION VEHICLE SYSTEMS FOR PEDESTRIANS

Authors

  • Jiří Plíhal
  • Matúš Šucha

Keywords:

vehicle systems, assistant systems, collision mitigation systems, active safety systems for pedestrians

Abstract

Pedestrian Collision Mitigation Systems - PCMS reducing severity of collisions with pedestrians, which are inevitable and decreasing probability of such accidents. By means of collision warning and automatic mitigation braking the systems contribute to the reducing vehicle speed in the moment when the probability of collision is high. Decreasing of collision energy enable to reduce seriousness and range of pedestrian's injury. Generally these systems are described by many features like strategy of control, minimal requirements on functionality, basic elements of HMI, minimal requirements on diagnostics, response to system failure and specification of testing procedures for collision mitigation. According to the rate of system intervention to the vehicle control and level of driver warning it is possible to distinguish various types of system that enable partial autonomous vehicle control in longitudinal direction thereby reduction of driver disturbances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) AARTS, L. T., VAN SCHAGEN, I. Driving speed and the risk of road crashes; a review.
Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2006. Str. 38, 215–224.
(2) FARMER, C., M. New evidence concerning fatal crashes of passenger vehicles before
and after adding antilock braking systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention. (2001). Str.
361-369.
(3) Informace o nehodovosti na pozemních komunikacích ČR za rok 2013. In: Policie ČR.
[Online]. [vid. 12. 2. 2014]. Dostupné z www.policie.cz/soubor/2013-12-informacepdf.
aspx
(4) ISO / PWI 19237, Návrh normy. Intelligent Transport Systems – Pedestrian Collision
Mitigation Systems – Operation, Performance, and Verification Requirements.
(5) ITARDA, Japan Traffic Accident Databases (J-TAD). [Online]. [vid. 12. 2. 2014].
Dostupné z http://www.itarda.or.jp/english/e_outline1.php
(6) NHTSA, Traffic safety facts 2010. [Online]. [vid. 12. 2. 2014]. Dostupné z http://wwwnrd.
nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811659.pdf
(7) Raksincharoensak, P. Drive Recorder Database Center in Tokyo University of
Agriculture and Technology. [Online]. [vid. 12. 2. 2014]. Dostupné z http://www.fotnet.
eu/download/international_workshops/tokyo/rt3_20131014_fotnet_pr_tuat_raksincha
roensak.pdf
(8) Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch Deutschland and internationales 2012.
[Online]. [vid. 12. 2. 2014]. Dostupné z
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/StatistischesJahrbuch/StatistischesJahrbuch20
12.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
(9) Wilde, G. J. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health.
Risk analysis, 2(4), 209-225.

Published

2015-11-09

How to Cite

Plíhal, J., & Šucha, M. . (2015). INTELLIGENT VEHICLE SYSTEMS – COLLISION MITIGATION VEHICLE SYSTEMS FOR PEDESTRIANS. Perner’s Contacts, 10(3), 118–125. Retrieved from https://pernerscontacts.upce.cz/index.php/perner/article/view/676

Issue

Section

Articles