IS THE INFLUENCE OF AN ANCHOR IN TRANSPORT SAME FOR EVERY GENERATION?

Case study in deciding on the ticket price

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46585/pc.2021.2.1716

Keywords:

irrational decisions, generation X, generation Y, generation Z, anchor effect, price, plane tickets

Abstract

There are many articles available about cognitive biases that show why people often make irrational decisions. Cognitive biases can come in the form of decoy effects, paradoxes of choice, halo effects, or availability heuristics. This paper deals with the effects anchoring or imprinting effect. People tend to be influenced by random numbers that they see before making their decisions about prices or purchases. The question is if all generations are sensitive in the same way or if there is any difference between generations when it comes to the anchoring effect. This question is answered through research on decision-making in relation to plane ticket prices. Subjects were surveyed by demographics such as their generation.  ANOVA was one method used that showed that younger generations were more sensitive to the anchor than the older ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso–Almeida, M.D.M., Llach, J. 2019. Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross-national analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. [online]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1675 [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Ariely, D. 2009. Jak drahé je zdarma. Praha: Práh

Cialdini, R. a kol. 1975, Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique. Journal oj Personality and Social Psychology. [online]. Dostupné z: http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Influence_Compliance/Cialdini.et.al.Reciprocal.Concessions.Procedure.1975.article.pdf 7 [cit.: 21. 10. 2021].

Cogin, J., 2012. Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management [online]. Dostupné z: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585192.2011.610967 [cit.: 21. 10. 2021].

Delbosc, A. 2017. Delay or forgo? A closer look at youth driver licensing trends in the United States and Australia. Tranposrtation. [online]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9685-7 [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Forbes. 2017. Práce, jídlo, peníze a vztahy. [online]. Dostupné z: http://generace.forbes.cz/tabulka/[cit.: 21. 10. 2021].

Fry, R. 2018. Pew Research Center. [Online]. Dostupné z: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/11/millennials-largest-generation-us-labor-force/ [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Grimsrud, M., El-Geneidy, A. 2014. Transit to eternal youth: lifecycle and generational trends in Greater Montreal public transport mode share. Transportation. [online]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9454-9 [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Cheng, Z., Xu, Y, Pan, Y. 2018. Dialectical relationship between millennial employee retention and well-being. 2nd international conference on economics and management, education, humanities and social sciences. Wuhan, 29.-30.března 2018. Wuhan, Čína: Atlantis Press, s.264-267.

Kahneman D., Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory – analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47(2), s.263-291

Khan, Fatma, M., Kumar, V., Amoroso, S. 2021. Do experience and engagement matter to millennial consumers?. Marketing intelligence & planning. 39 (2), 329-341.

Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Dargay, J. 2011. A New Generation: Travel Trends for young Germans and Britons. Transportation Research Record. [online]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.3141/2230-07 [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Licite, L., Janmere, L. 2017. Millennial Student Expectations towards Higher Education in Latvia. 16th International Scientific Conference on Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava, 24-26. Května. Jeglava, Litva: Latvia Univ Agriculture, s. 1440-1445.

Mai, J. 2018. Jak jsem šel pro mléko a vrátil se s kolem. Praha: Portál.

McRaney, D. 2014. Nejste tak chytří, jak si myslíte. Brno: BizBooks

Parry, E., Urwin, P. 2011. Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence. IJMR. [online]. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Pew Research Center. 2019. The generations defined. [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Pew Research Center. 2020. Millennials. [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/generations-age/generations/millennials/ [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Pojkarová, K., Gottwald, D. 2020. The irrationality of consumers choosing plane tickets. Perner’s Contacts, 15(2), s. 1-12

Sao, R., Tolani, K. 2018. What Do Millennials Desire For? A Study of Expectations From Workplace. Helix. [online]. Dostupné z: http://helix.dnares.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/4157-4160.pdf [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Schalie, Barbara. 2020. Introducing Generation Z: Who Are They and How Will They Impact the Clinical Research Workplace? SOCRA. [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.socra.org/blog/introducing-generation-z-who-are-they-and-how-will-they-impact-the-clinical-research-workplace/[cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Sítě v hrsti. 2021. Kdo je Generace X, Y (miléniálové), tichá generace Z a Baby boomers? [online]. Dostupné z: https://sitevhrsti.cz/generace-x-y-z-baby-boomers/ [cit.: 20. 10. 2021].

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty – heuristics and biases. Science. 185 (4157), s. 1124-1131

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Pojkarová, K. (2021). IS THE INFLUENCE OF AN ANCHOR IN TRANSPORT SAME FOR EVERY GENERATION? Case study in deciding on the ticket price . Perner’s Contacts, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.46585/pc.2021.2.1716
Received 2021-10-28
Accepted 2021-11-25
Published 2021-12-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>