TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AND ROAD TRANSPORT SAFETY NEW DEVELOPMENT
Keywords:
traffic conflicts, road safety, conflict analysisAbstract
Adoption of the “Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council No. 2008/96/EC on road infrastructure safety management" (29) brought a new impetus to road traffic safety evaluation. The consequent Czech Act No. 152/2011 Coll. on roads obliges their operators to evaluate the traffic safety on a regular basis. It brings a new challenge – evaluation of road safety using traffic conflict analysis techniques and performance measurement. This paper follows the article (28) published earlier.
Downloads
References
(1) ALLEN, B.L., SHIN, B.T., COOPER, P.J. Analysis of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions.
Department of Civil Engineering, Mc. Master University, 1977.
(2) AMBROS, J Traffic conflict technique in the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the 24th
ICTCT Workshop in Warsaw 27.-28. Oct. 2011. Session Risk Assessments/Safety
Assessments, 2011.
(3) AMUNDSEN, F.H., HYDÉN, C. Proceedings: First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts. Oslo:
Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1977. ISBN 82-7133-195-7.
(4) ARCHER, J. Traffic Conflict Technique. Historical to current State-of-the-Art.
Stockholm: Institutionen för Infrastruktur KTH, Stockholm, 2001. s. 2-3.
(5) ARCHER, J Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application
in micro-simulation modeling: A study of urban and suburban intersections. Doctoral
Dissertation. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2005. ISBN 91-7323-
-3.
(6) BLUMENTHAL, M., Dimensions of the Traffic Safety Problem. Traffic Safety Research
Review 12, 7-12, March 1968, 1968.
(7)] CHIN, H.C., QUEK, S.T. Measurement of Traffic Conflicts, Safety Science, Vol. 26,
No.3, 1977. pp. 169-187.
(8) DAVIS, G., HOURDOS, J., XIONG, H. Outline of a causal theory of traffic conflicts and
collisions. In Proceedings of 87th Anual TRB meeting Washington, DC: 2008.
(9) DINGUS et al. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II-Results of the 100-Car
field experiment. Washington: Department of Transportation, DOT HS 810 593,
Washington D.C, 2006.
(10) FOLPRECHT, J. Dosavadní vývoj a perspektivy metody sledování a hodnocení
konfliktních situací v silničním provozu. In Silniční obzor 61, 2000. pp. 39-44.
(11) FOLPRECHT, J., KŘIVDA, V. Organizace a řízení dopravy I. Ostrava: VŠB-TU
Ostrava, 2006. 158 s. ISBN 80-248-1030-1.
(12) GRAYSON, G.B, HYDÉN, C., KRAAY, J.H., MUHLRAD, N., OPPE, S. The Malmö
Study. A Calibration of Traffic Conflict Techniques. SWOV Report R-84-12.
Leidschendam: 1984.
(13) GSTALTER, H., FASTENMEIER, W. Thirty years of traffic safety research: A personal
retrospective of concepts and methods. In: Proceedings of 20th ICTCT Workshop.,
Session IV-Methodological Issues.
(14) GUO, F., KLAUER, S.G., HANKEY, J.M., DINGUS, T.A. Near-crashes as crash
surrogate for naturalistic driving studies. Transportation Research Record, 2147, 2010.
pp. 64-66.
(15) HYDÉN, C. The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: the Swedish
traffic conflict technique. Doctoral Thesis. Lund: Lund University, Department of Traffic
Planning and Engineering, 1987.
(16) KOCOUREK, J., KOČÁRKOVÁ, D., PADĚLEK, T.: Sledování a vyhodnocování
dopravních konfliktů rámci projektu "Konflikt". In Příspěvek na konferenci Bezpečnosť
dopravy na pozemných komunikáciách. Senec: 2012.
(17) KLAUER, S. G., DINGUS, T.A., NEALE, V.L., SUDWEEKS, J., RAMSEY, D.J
NHTSA – The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near Crash Risk Analysis of Using the 100
Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. DOT HS 810 594. April 2006. Blacksburg, VA:
VTTI, 2006. <http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=786825>.
(18) KŘIVDA, V. Video-Analysis of Conflict Situations on Selected Roundabouts in the Czech
Republic. Communications. Žilina: University of Žilina, 2011, roč. 13, č. 3, s. 77-82,
ISSN 1335-4205.
(19) LAURESHYN, A. Application of automated video-analysis to road user behavior.
Doctoral Thesis. Lund: Bulletin-Lund Universitet, 2010. ISBN 978-91-628-8003-3.
(20) LAURESHYN, A., ARDÖ, H., JONSSON, T., SVENSSON, A. Application of
automated video analysis for behavioural studies: concept and experience. IET Intelligent
Transport Systems 3 (3), 2009. 345–357.
(21) LAURESHYN, A., SVENSSON, A., HYDÉN, C. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on
micro-level behavioural data. Theoretical framework and first implementation. Accident
Analysis and Prevention (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.021, 2010. Elsevier Ltd.
(22) MINDERHOUND, M.M., BOVY, P.H.L. Extended time-to-collision measures for road
traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33, 2001. pp. 89–97.
(23) MIGLETZ, D.J., GLAUZ, W.D., BAUER, K.M. Relationship between traffic conflicts
and accidents. Report No.: FHWA/RD-84/042. US Department of Transportation, Federal
Higway Administration, 1985.
(24) SLABÝ, P., KOCOUREK, J. Metoda sledování dopravních konfliktů. Silniční obzor 67,
s 275-278.
(25) PERKINS, S.R., HARRIS, J.I. Traffic conflicts characteristics: Accident Potential at
intersections. Highway Research Record, 225, 1968. s. 35-43.
(26) SVENSSON, A. A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective.
Doctoral Thesis. Lund: University of Lund, Lund Institute of Technology, Department of
Traffic Planning and Engineering, 1998.
(27) TARKO, A., DAVIES, G., SAUNIER, N., SAYED, T., WASHINGTON, S. White paper
Surrogate Measures of Safety, ANB20(3) Subcomitee on Surrogate Measures of Safety,
April 28, 2009 <https://wiki.umn.edu/pub/TRB_ANB203/webhome/Surrogate>.
(28) ZAJÍC, P., KŘIVDA, V., ŘEZÁČ, M. Traffic conflicts as safety indicator. Current state
and development. In Transactions of VŠB TU Ostrava, Mechanical Series, No 2, 2012.
Ostrava: VŠB-TU Ostrava, 2012. ISSN 1804-0993.
(29) Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2008/96/ES ze dne 19.11.2008 o řízení
bezpečnosti silniční infrastruktury <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ.do>.
(30) Metodika sledování a vyhodnocování dopravních konfliktů v českém prostředí. Projekt
aplikovaného výzkumu ALFA TAČR č. TA01030096. <http://konflikt.cdvinfo.cz>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Pavel Zajíc
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
